More proof that blogs are valid news sources

WE'VE MOVED! Democratic Convention Watch is now at http://www.DemocraticConventionWatch.com

We've told you about several errors that big media sources have made this primary season. This time The News Tribune of Tacoma points out a problem with the New York Time's superdelegate list.

NYT says superdelegate Mast is for Clinton. Mast disagrees.

Posted by Niki Sullivan @ 10:31:20 am

We ran a story this morning (posted here last night) about Washington state's remaining uncommitted superdelegates and whether their resolve has cracked yet. The answer: No.

But we were puzzled by one bit: The Superdelegate Transparency Project said Sharon Mast is uncommitted. The New York Times says she's a Hillary delegate.

I just got off the phone with Mast. She says she's uncommitted.

"I was surprised when I went to The New York Times site and saw that I was committed," she said. "I have been uncommitted all along in this process."

She said she intends to "remain so until this process completes itself."

I'm always suspicious of passive statements, so I asked how the process will "complete itself." "We have some states left and one more territory," she said.

I asked where she thinks the Times got the idea she was a Clinton supporter: "I have no idea. It doesn't matter. In real life, I know where I'm at, which is uncommitted." - News Tribune

If you're not familiar with the Superdelegate Transparency Project they use our superdelegate lists to compare how superdelegates have endorsed in comparison with their constituents.