Thursday, August 28, 2008

The Acceptance Speeches

WE'VE MOVED! Democratic Convention Watch is now at http://www.DemocraticConventionWatch.com

Tonight, Barack Obama will accept the Democratic nomination for President of these United States at Invesco Field in Denver. A simple sentence.

Here at DCW, we broke the story that the speech would be at Invesco, and not at the Pepsi Center. We, and many others, are interested in the historical nature of the event and its venue. The first outdoor acceptance speech since Kennedy in Los Angeles in 1960. Potentially the largest worldwide audience ever for such an event. The singular uniqueness of the candidate himself.

Pundits will undoubtedly spend today commenting on what Obama is going to say, and how he is going to say it, and whether he says “what he needs to.” That’s political punditry for you.

Speeches get written. Often by professional speechwriters who know how to turn phrases in such a way as to reframe candidates. (Remember Peggy Noonan’s line? “Read my lips: no new taxes.”) Some people can write, but put front of several hundred people, they lack that spark which electrifies. If you’ve ever spoken before several hundred people, you know in that first moment that you look out whether this is something you have to do, or something you want to do.

Other people are actors: they can read the words others have written, and deliver them in such a mesmerizing way that simple words become unforgettable, maybe even part of our vernacular. (Remember? “Play it, Sam.”)

Sometimes there is that rare individual who can write his own words, and then speak with clarity from the heart, soul and mind simultaneously, with true authenticity. Sometimes, you know the words are so genuine that they express the essence of what an individual is at base.

It has been reported in the past that Senator Obama writes his own speeches. On the first page of yesterday’s USA Today they say that he wrote this one in a hotel room 15 minutes from home. And amazingly to those of us who are residents of ObamaNation, for many people, this may be the first time they hear how well the Senator writes.

He will do what he does: speak the truth, in potentially nuanced terms. Senator Obama will not dumb down his words, he honours his audience by expecting them to rise to his level. He will give us all his very best.

And on this cusp between the dénouement of the Democratic Convention, and the soon to begin dual Republican conventions in Minneapolis and Saint Paul, we should also look at the speech that John McCain will be giving next Thursday. Most likely in competition with a football game. (Same kind of planning that was involved in invading a sovereign nation, but I digress.)

McCain’s speech was written by Mark Salter. According to Newsweek (September 1, page 10) McCain has been practicing since last weekend. Someone else’s words. Someone else’s view of the world.

While others will compare and contrast the speeches on political grounds, or on strategic grounds, my comparison is much more simplistic. If one puts himself up to lead the greatest country in the world, and one will make the most important speech of his campaign, ostensibly laying out his vision, his policies, his plans, and his definition of himself, and he cannot even find his own words: what does that mean for his ability to say anything by himself?

Comments (11)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
I have to say, I disagree very much on this point. Every politician uses speech writers, and Mark Salter has been working with and writing for John McCain for years. Like any good speech writer, he has mastered McCain's voice, and he writes McCain better than McCain himself. There are many perfectly valid things to criticize McCain for, but I don't think this is one.
Reply
Don't worry, Rich, I WILL be criticizing him on all the other things, too.

And as for the use of speechwriters -- there is a Grand Canyon's worth of difference between people who utilize speechwriters to polish their ideas, and clean up their prose, and those who use speechwriters to choose the topics and frame the message.
Reply
the boy from Oz's avatar

the boy from Oz · 865 weeks ago

Nup - I'm all the way with you on this one. The reason Barack writes and speaks so well is because he has thought through what he believes in. He knows why he believes it and is confident in it and ready to be challenged on it.

That's why he is ready to lead.
Reply
SlippyPigskin's avatar

SlippyPigskin · 865 weeks ago

"the speech that John McCain will be giving next Thursday. Most likely in competition with a football game."
Actually college football kickoff is tonight with two games (NC State v. South Carolina and Oregon V. Stanford) that should draw a pretty good number, especially given that it is kickoff weekend.
Next week however has one game (South Carolina V. Vandy) which is probably more likely to draw more solid McCain voters anyway.
I guess we should all just be happy that there's not a BIG 10 or Big 12 match-up on the tube tonight, since that's where the swing states are. ;)
Reply
1 reply · active 865 weeks ago
there are also a bunch of pre-season NFL games tonight.
Reply
SlippyPigskin's avatar

SlippyPigskin · 865 weeks ago

true. but most starters will be out of those games by the time Bill Richarson finishes up.
Reply
A nice post, Jessica, and I've always felt good about politicians who write their own speeches.

I'm very confident about Obama's chances in November. But, as always, there are a few things that concern me a bit.

One is that there seems to be an overwhelming opinion, both among Democrats and others, that Obama will shred McCain in the debates.

While their policies have converged, McCain is not Bush in this respect. McCain can think on his feet and is very good in extemporaneous speaking. For short format replies, he's better at it than Obama, although Obama is no slouch. The Republican slander that Obama is only good with a teleprompter is based on this: there is no comparison between their major speeches, and Obama pulls ahead whenever he gets to give an answer longer than about thirty seconds. But under that, McCain is better, perhaps in part because Obama takes about that long to think through all the ramifications of the question. An admirable trait in a President, but not as useful for a debater.

I know this is looking ahead, but I'm concerned that McCain will be seen as "winning" the debates, because the expectations for him will be so low.
Reply
2 replies · active 865 weeks ago
Scott -- First, THANKS!

Now, as you know, this is not my first campaign, and what I can tell you from previous experience is that one of things that Obama does very well, and better than most, is to learn from his mistakes, and improve his game. He's had a steep learning curve, and if you look at his debate performance from last year to this year (excluding that offensive Gibson-Stephanopoulos farce at that Constitution Center I respect so much) -- he has learned, he has improved.

I have no doubt that he will be ready by the first debate to answer quickly, to use his sense of humour, to keep his answers succinct, within the time frame, and hard-hitting. The questions are not going to be an attempt to separate Democrats by hair-splitting on issues where there differences had little daylight between them. Rather (I HOPE HOPE HOPE) these debates will ask about contrasting differences in Iraq, on the economy, on birth control and abortion, on gay marriage, on energy, and all the rest.

Here, Obama does not need to find a nuanced position to differentiate himself from 10 other Democrats, he needs to project the Democratic platform. And that will be easier, and he's going to do it, do it well, and with aplomb. I have no doubt.

McCain will lose the debates because his positions are wrong. No amount of showmanship can change that. And this won't be a town hall where he can walk away -- this will be "But Senator McCain, we don't want to know about you being a POW, the question was, how many houses do you own NOW?"
Reply
One of the classes I teach is Astronomy. And one of the exercises I use is a presidential-style debate.

One third of the students are to argue for the position that the Sun goes around the Earth. One third argue that the Earth goes around the Sun. And one third act as moderators, asking questions of each side. The format is rigid, with each side getting a two minute opening statement and a two minute closing statement, and the moderators asking questions of each side alternately, with one minute for responses. At the end, the moderators recess and decide who they thought "won" the debate. The students know in advance which side they'll be arguing, and are invited to prepare carefully.

So what happens? Without fail, the side that argues that the Sun goes around the Earth wins. Often the moderators are quite sheepish about having to come to that conclusion.

So I have no faith in the idea that McCain will lose the debates because his positions are wrong. He may lose the ELECTION for that reason, and that's the important thing in the end. But I can't think of a Presidential debate that has turned on substantive policy differences. (I'm sure some of you out there can come up with an example or two, and I'd be interested to be reminded of them...)
Reply
No Scott, I don't know of a case -- but I know that this is NOT OUR DADDY'S ELECTION -- and while I certainly understand that most people vote on "who they like" or "who has the better outfit" and other nonsense -- I HAVE HOPE!!!

And Scott -- you know how some people do puzzles, where they take the clues, and bit by bit figure out the whole crossword, or jigsaw, or logic puzzle? And sometime in there is the aha! moment. My aha moment for today is "Berkley" (grin)
Reply

Comments by