WE'VE MOVED! Democratic Convention Watch is now at http://www.DemocraticConventionWatch.com
Sure, if you've been following DCW, you can name all the Senators up next Tuesday. But there are other changes afoot. We could talk TLB Joe Lieberman, but not now. Nor Robert Byrd, who might be giving up his Chairmanship, and instead becoming "Chairman Emeritus". We could also talk who would get the Minority Leader if McConnell loses, but that is premature. That, along with the discussion I'm holding for after the election about how the Senate Republicans function if their entire 'tenured' bunch is gone. Who takes the reins? Who leads, who follows? Does their Senate agenda moderate or move further right?
For now, I'm talking about the fact that there will be either one brand new Senate face if McCain wins, and two if the Obama-Biden ticket wins. So who might replace them?
There are different state laws in place here. First, let's talk Arizona. I know, your initial thought is: can't Governor Nepolitano appoint whomever she wants? Actually, no, she is required by state law to appoint someone of the same party leaving the seat.
Her term (term limited) is up in 2010, and rumour has it that she'd like to run for the Senate. Therefore, she will probably be thinking of who she wants to run against. There are a couple of people interested in filling the position. Rumour has it former Rep. Jim Kolbe is high on her list. When he retired from the House last year, Napolitano appointed Kolbe to the Canamex Corridor Task Force, which deals with trade between Arizona, Mexico and Canada. However, he might not be acceptable to the GOP, since he is openly gay. Whoever gets the seat would fill out John's term, and therefore run in 2010.
On to Illinois. If Senator Obama becomes President Obama, his seat can be filled by a member of either party, and the appointment will come from Gov. Rod Blagojevich. Certainly, you've heard Jesse Jackson, Jr. express interest in the position, and rumours about the seat going to Tammy Duckworth have been floating for months.
But let's talk Rod. To say that he has potential ethics problems is like saying that Ted Stevens once accepted as a gift, a metal folding chair, instead of a $3000 Shiatsu Massage Chair. Also, under Illinois law, he can appoint himself. Remember, there's precedent about how the Senate deals with potential felons. I'm not saying the Senate would be safer than the governor's mansion, but....Also, he might want to appoint the state AG, there's a long-time "family feud", plus she might run against Rod, and this would take her out of the state.
But the most interesting is Delaware. If Joe Biden wins the Vice-Presidency, I am pretty sure that he would be the first sitting Senator to win that position and simultaneously win the Vice-Presidency. I'm pretty sure, but I'm counting on one of you to point out if if I am wrong. The logical choice would be Beau Biden, currently DE AG. But he's currently serving in Iraq. So a place-holder is needed, as the replacement election would be in 2010.
Ruth Ann Minner is the current governor, and if she wants it, she'd be a good choice as place-holder. She's 73. Her replacement will likely be Jack Markell, as he's polling at or above +30. He'd have to appoint her. And he actually can, because her term ends at 9 a.m. on January 20th, and, if elected, Senator Biden would become Vice President Biden at about noon on January 20th. Then again, if he wins, he could resign early, and let Governor Minner fill the seat, although she'd likely choose the current Lt. Governor, who might see himself more as "Senator" than "place holder."
Remember, stay with DemConWatch after the election for the best Transition and Inauguration coverage.
Karen Anne · 857 weeks ago
Does Napolitano's choice have to be confirmed by the legislature? If not, I think she should appoint him. Shake them up a little :-) Although there are the Log Cabin Republicans, whose thought processes escape me.
mintrepublic 17p · 857 weeks ago
26376 66p · 857 weeks ago
Rod has said he likes being Governor. Presumably he likes it more than having Rahm Emanuel's seat in Congress (his previous job). There would have to be some stark writing on the wall for Rod to not run for re-election in 2010. If he sees that coming now, the Senate might be a safer place than ... well, I can't say the governor's mansion, because that's in Springfield, so Blagojevich doesn't actually live there. The only reason I think he wouldn't appoint himself, though, is that he likes being Governor too much.
If he's looking for someone to just ride out the term, I think Emil Jones is a dark horse. I thought that as soon as he said he would leave the Illinois Senate this year. If he wants someone who could be re-elected in 2010, then the field is different. With the current climate in Illinois, statewide Republicans have little shot at anything; that could change by 2010, but right now the Democrats have a bit of a cake walk. (Greens are also certified statewide through 2010, since Whitney got at least 5% of the vote in 2006.) That doesn't mean Blagojevich could appoint a real zero and get him/her re-elected; I don't think we'll see a Harriet Myers choice. Duckworth lost a close race in IL-06 in 2006 before becoming Director of Veterans Affairs; I don't know what her popularity is Downstate. Another member of Congress ... I don't see it. I think Rod will go with someone doing time in Springfield who he'd either like to reward or get out.
Oh -- one last thought: One thing that could change the game in Illinois is the con-con question. If the vote is YES, Blagojevich could see that as writing on the wall against him (and he'd probably be right, though recall is not the only reason there are peoplein the YES camp), and get while the getting is good.
Peter Zenger 62p · 857 weeks ago
DocJess 71p · 857 weeks ago
Peter Zenger 62p · 857 weeks ago
I know that no one is happy with Lieberman, and he is most definitely NOT a team player. I would rather that the Senate have each committee chaired by someone who is in the game to make progress and I don't know if Joe would help that effort. I am not quite ready to totally dump him from the caucus, after all he would still be a vote for cloture on healthcare, education and other important issues. Perhaps this is a pragmatic Nebraska perspective, but then again I have voted for both Chuck Hagel and Ben Nelson. I am never 100% happy with either of them, but like a barbed wire fence, they have their good points.
Karen Anne · 857 weeks ago
mintrepublic 17p · 857 weeks ago
Yirmiyahu · 857 weeks ago
isuquinndog · 857 weeks ago
mintrepublic 17p · 857 weeks ago
26376 66p · 857 weeks ago
26376 66p · 857 weeks ago