Tuesday, July 29, 2008

Do I hear 60 calling?

WE'VE MOVED! Democratic Convention Watch is now at http://www.DemocraticConventionWatch.com

With Ted Stevens, it was always a case of which came first, the election or the indictment. But when I wrote this past Sunday

"Remember, Stevens won his last election with 72% of the vote, and has been there longer than a lot of people have been alive (since 1968) – and don’t forget, there’s an indictment coming."
I had no idea we were T-H-I-S close.

The indictment presents two interesting sides. First, the Alaska primary is not until 26 August, and one must withdraw one’s name 45 days before the primary date, or stay on the ballot. So Stevens stays. Now, Stevens has almost $1.5 million cash on hand, and if you add all 6 of his other competitors together, they don’t have half a million. In fact, in total, they have $71,298 cash on hand as of 30 June.

If he wins the primary, Stevens can withdraw from the general up to 45 days before Election Day, giving him a few weeks to make a decision, but if he doesn’t want to pull his name, the State GOP doesn’t seem able to make him. And even if they did, who would they run? A Republican who would have lost to Stevens in the primary? Sarah Palin with her pending legal problems? Key words “abuse of power” “firing/not firing” “child custody battle” “sister”.

Expect a lot of the professional pollsters to suddenly move those “Republican Lean” and “Toss-up” ratings.


The second side is the money that Stevens PAC has doled out.
"Stevens' Northern Lights PAC has doled out almost $145,000 to GOP candidates this cycle, including $10,000 checks to Republicans Elizabeth Dole, Pat Roberts and Gordon Smith, all running for re-election against credible challengers this year, as well as smaller checks to John Sununu, Roger Wicker, Mike Johanns, Mitch McConnell and John Cornyn. The PAC also handed a $5,000 check to John McCain's presidential campaign."
Don’t campaigns normally give back money from criminals? Oh, sorry, “an indictment is not a conviction.”

Remember, Stevens still has his supporters.
"Another Republican, Sen. Arlen Specter of Pennsylvania, said, "I have known Ted Stevens for 28 years, and I have always found him to be impeccably honest."

Comments (4)

Loading... Logging you in...
  • Logged in as
Login or signup now to comment.
Palin's "pending legal problems"???!!!??? That'controversy' has already been debunked with Palin looking tougher, stronger and better than ever, even garnering sympathy for unfair media attacks. Anyway, the result -- after the 'controversy' -- is she polled a phenomenal 80% approval rating in Alaska.

Anyway, the Stevens thing only helps Palin because she ran and won on a fight corruption platform, and if Stevens resigns, Palin will be able to appoint his successor who will have an advantage and much better chance of retaining the seat GOP than Stevens did.
Reply
1 reply · active 872 weeks ago
Peter Zenger's avatar

Peter Zenger · 872 weeks ago

If he resigned today, you would think that she would be required to appoint one of the folks running in the primary. There wouldn't be much point in creating an "incumbent" that wouldn't be able to run in less than 100 days.
Reply
Um... if they're so debunked, how do you explain, from the link I posted:

"Alaska lawmakers on Monday approved an investigation into whether Gov. Sarah Palin abused her power in firing a public safety commissioner."

And that "Monday" is July 28 2008.
Reply
Ed Espinoza's avatar

Ed Espinoza · 872 weeks ago

But can the Gov appoint within a certain number of days before a general election? Some states do not allow for that practice.
Reply

Comments by