WE'VE MOVED! Democratic Convention Watch is now at http://www.DemocraticConventionWatch.com
Update 7/18: Latest projection: Obama leads 305-233, no change from the July 15 or July 13 forecasts. When the primaries ended in early June, it was thought we'd have a month of movement, followed by status quo until the VP picks and the conventions. That seems to be where we are.
Please also check out our Senate Forecast and House Forecast.
Map showing consensus of sources. This table will show a state Blue or Red if a majority of the sources show it Leaning or Solid for that candidate.
DCW Presidential Forecast | |||||||||||
State | EVs | Open Left | Elect. Proj. | EV. com | RCP | FHQ | RM | 538.com | CNN | NBC | .... |
Date | 7/18 | 7/18 | 7/18 | 7/15 | 7/16 | 7/16 | 7/18 | 6/27 | 7/9 | ||
Obama-Strong (O) | 227 | 204 | 211 | 153 | 175 | 210 | 210 | 153 | 168 | ||
Obama-Lean (OL) | 66 | 60 | 35 | 102 | 47 | 83 | 63 | 78 | 42 | ||
Tossup (T) | 61 | 103 | 114 | 120 | 167 | 18 | 38 | 113 | 139 | ||
McCain-Lean (ML) | 97 | 98 | 95 | 73 | 58 | 62 | 70 | 69 | 53 | ||
McCain-Strong (M) | 87 | 73 | 83 | 90 | 91 | 165 | 154 | 125 | 136 | ||
Obama Total | 293 | 264 | 246 | 255 | 222 | 293 | 273 | 231 | 210 | ||
McCain Total | 184 | 171 | 178 | 163 | 149 | 227 | 224 | 194 | 189 | ||
Obama Est. | 330 | 323 | 315 | 309 | 308 | 298 | 292 | 286 | 282 | ||
Texas | 34 | ML | ML | ML | ML | ML | M | M | M | M | |
Florida | 27 | ML | T | ML | T | T | ML | ML | T | T | |
Pennsylvania | 21 | OL | OL | T | OL | T | OL | OL | OL | T | |
Ohio | 20 | OL | T | T | T | T | OL | T | T | T | |
Michigan | 17 | O | OL | OL | OL | T | OL | OL | T | T | |
Georgia | 15 | ML | ML | ML | ML | ML | M | M | ML | ML | |
New Jersey | 15 | O | O | O | OL | OL | O | O | OL | OL | |
N. Carolina | 15 | T | T | T | T | T | ML | ML | ML | ML | |
Virginia | 13 | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | |
Indiana | 11 | T | ML | T | T | T | M | ML | ML | ML | |
Missouri | 11 | T | T | T | T | T | ML | ML | T | T | |
Washington | 11 | O | O | O | OL | O | O | O | OL | O | |
Arizona | 10 | ML | ML | M | M | M | M | M | M | M | |
Minnesota | 10 | O | O | O | OL | O | O | O | OL | OL | |
Wisconsin | 10 | O | OL | O | OL | OL | O | O | OL | OL | |
Colorado | 9 | OL | T | T | T | T | OL | OL | T | T | |
Louisiana | 9 | M | M | M | ML | M | M | M | ML | M | |
S. Carolina | 8 | ML | ML | ML | M | T | M | M | M | M | |
Iowa | 7 | OL | OL | O | OL | OL | OL | OL | T | T | |
Oregon | 7 | O | O | OL | OL | OL | O | O | OL | OL | |
Arkansas | 6 | M | ML | M | M | M | M | M | ML | M | |
Mississippi | 6 | M | ML | ML | ML | ML | M | M | M | M | |
Nevada | 5 | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | T | |
New Mexico | 5 | OL | OL | OL | T | OL | OL | OL | ML | T | |
W. Virginia | 5 | M | ML | ML | M | M | M | M | ML | M | |
Maine | 4 | O | O | O | OL | O | O | O | OL | O | |
NH | 4 | OL | O | O | T | T | OL | OL | T | T | |
Alaska | 3 | ML | M | T | ML | ML | M | M | M | ML | |
Delaware | 3 | O | O | OL | O | OL | O | O | O | O | |
Montana | 3 | T | T | OL | ML | T | ML | ML | ML | ML | |
N. Dakota | 3 | T | M | T | ML | T | ML | ML | M | ML | |
S. Dakota | 3 | M | ML | T | M | M | ML | M | M | ML | |
Open Left | Elect. Proj. | EV. com | RCP | FHQ | RM | 538.com | CNN | NBC | .... |
Notes:
538 - FiveThirtyEight - Safe and Likely mapped to Strong (O or M), Lean to Lean (OL or ML), Tossup to Tossup (T)
CNN - Safe mapped to Strong, Leaning to Lean, Tossup to Tossup
Elect. Proj. - Election Projection - Solid and Strong mapped to Strong, Moderate to Lean, Weak to Tossup
EV.com - Electoral-Vote.com - Strong mapped to Strong, Weak to Lean, Barely and Tossup to Tossup
FHQ - FrontLoading HQ - Solid mapped to Strong, Lean to Lean, Tossup (Dem and Rep) to Tossup
NBC - Base mapped to strong, Lean to Lean, Tossup to Tossup
OpenLeft - Solid mapped to Strong, Lean to Lean, Tossup to Tossup
RM - Rasmussen - Safe and Likely mapped to Strong, Lean to Lean, Tossup to Tossup
RCP - RealClearPolitics - Solid mapped to Strong, Lean to Lean, Tossup to Tossup
Here are the states that span 3 categories.
- Alaska: Now only 1 at Tossup, 4 at McCain-Strong. Rasmussen's own poll shows McCain only up by 4, yet they still have AK as Likely-Republican, which we convert to McCain-Strong.
- Indiana: 4 at Tossup, Rasmussen at McCain-Strong.
- Iowa: One at Obama-Strong, NBC and CNN still calling it a Tossup.
- Michigan: 1 Obama-Strong, 3 Tossups.
- Montana : EV.com at Obama-Lean, 5 at McCain-Lean. EV.com will exactly follow the latest poll if no other poll has been published within the week.
- New Hampshire: 4 at Tossup, 2 at Obama-Strong.
- New Mexico: Six projections have it as Obama-Lean, CNN has it at McCain-Lean. Two recent polls show Obama up by 3 and 8 points.
- North Dakota - Three now at tossup. Now that we finally have a recent poll, all tied at 43, it's the 2 McCain-Strongs, Election Projection and CNN that are the outliers. EP uses a formula that essentially treats the 2004 results as a recent state poll (modified by differences in the national numbers, which would move the ND results from 2004 by 5-6 points). But until more ND polls come out, the '04 results are going to be a drag on their projection. This is also effecting their Alaska projection. CNN - well, they're just lazy.
Oregon - 1 Tossup, 3 Obama-Strong.Pennsylvania: 1 Obama-Strong, 3 Tossups.- South Carolina: 1 Tossup, 5 McCain-Strong
- South Dakota: 1 Tossup, 5 McCain-Strong
The overall projection is just a straight average of each projections' estimate of Electoral Votes (EVs) for each candidate. For each projection other than FiveThirtyEight, we give Obama 100% of the EVs in a state that is solid for him, 80% of the EVs for a leaner, 50% of the EVs for a Tossup, 20% of the EVs for state that is McCain-Lean, and 0% of the Solid McCain states. Exact opposite for McCain. For FiveThirtyEight, we use their overall estimate of Obama's EVs, not the state-by-state categories.

Leah 85p · 871 weeks ago
Matt - the graph is looking pretty spiffy :)
Leah 85p · 871 weeks ago
http://freerepublic.com/focus/f-bloggers/2019367/...
uplandpoet · 871 weeks ago
OregonDem 44p · 871 weeks ago
But for the month (6-18 to 7-18) Obama saw significant improvement in 11 states while McCain only 3. :-)
OregonDem 44p · 871 weeks ago
It therefore is real easy to track changes over time in each state and better see the slight movements (in comparison to ordering the states by EVs.
tmess2 · 871 weeks ago
uplandpoet · 871 weeks ago
Leah 85p · 871 weeks ago
http://embeds.blogs.foxnews.com/2008/07/20/obamas...
susan · 871 weeks ago
The real issue is not how well Obama or McCain might do in the closely divided battleground states, but that we shouldn't have battleground states and spectator states in the first place. Every vote in every state should be politically relevant in a presidential election. And, every vote should be equal. We should have a national popular vote for President in which the White House goes to the candidate who gets the most popular votes in all 50 states.
The National Popular Vote bill would guarantee the Presidency to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC). The bill would take effect only when enacted, in identical form, by states possessing a majority of the electoral vote -- that is, enough electoral votes to elect a President (270 of 538). When the bill comes into effect, all the electoral votes from those states would be awarded to the presidential candidate who receives the most popular votes in all 50 states (and DC).
Because of state-by-state enacted rules for winner-take-all awarding of their electoral votes, recent candidates with limited funds in 2004 concentrated their attention on a handful of closely divided "battleground" states. Two-thirds of the visits and money were focused in just six states; 88% on 9 states, and 99% of the money went to just 16 states. Two-thirds of the states and people were merely spectators to the presidential election.
Another shortcoming of the current system is that a candidate can win the Presidency without winning the most popular votes nationwide.
The National Popular Vote bill has been approved by 20 legislative chambers (one house in Colorado, Arkansas, Maine, Massachusetts, North Carolina, and Washington, and two houses in Maryland, Illinois, Hawaii, California, New Jersey, Rhode Island, and Vermont). It has been enacted into law in Hawaii, Illinois, New Jersey, and Maryland. These states have 50 (19%) of the 270 electoral votes needed to bring this legislation into effect.
See http://www.NationalPopularVote.com
mintrepublic 17p · 871 weeks ago
uplandpoet · 871 weeks ago
proportional representation... electoral college mess
Category: News and Politics
I posted a blog on Jan 10, 2008 at myspace.com/uplandpoet, if anyone cares to read my thoughts, or you can follow the link to my source sight, either way, i will not be reposting this information anywhere else on this site!
See if this helps: (well dernit, the graphs do not come through! you can go to this link:
http://www.bbvforums.org/forums/messages/72/30340...
Leah 85p · 871 weeks ago
OHIO
Monday Obama +8 (PPP)
Tuesday McCain +10 (Rasmussen)
This goes to show that polls should be taken with a grain of salt!
uplandpoet · 871 weeks ago
Cob_NJ 8p · 871 weeks ago
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/07/todays-pol...
http://www.fivethirtyeight.com/2008/07/dueling-oh...
Worth a read, IMHO.
Matt 75p · 871 weeks ago